Short Summary

A Fast Track Special Court in Imphal, Manipur, has sentenced 53‑year‑old Huidrom Amusana to 20 years’ rigorous imprisonment and fined him ₹5,000 under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The conviction followed his conviction for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a minor on March 7, 2018. Authorities ordered ₹4 lakh in compensation to be disbursed to the victim from the Victim Compensation Fund within 30 days. The court also credited the accused’s pre‑trial detention of six months and 22 days towards the sentence.

---

In‑Depth Article: Manipur’s Strong Stand on Child Safety

Understanding the Context

When news like this breaks, it buckles your heart. It isn’t just another crime—it’s a hard reminder of the vulnerable situations children can face. While Manipur has had similar cases before, this one hit headlines because the court imposed a harsh punishment—signaling that wrongdoing against minors won’t be taken lightly.

---

1. Case Details: What Happened?

Who?

• Accused: Huidrom Amusana, 53, from Nungoi Makha Leikai, Imphal East district
• Victim: A minor girl, aged under 18

When?

• Assault date: Around 3 PM on March 7, 2018, at the accused’s bedroom
• Incident reported: March 9, 2018, by victim’s mother

How?

• The accused lured the girl, bought her a snack, forcibly kissed her, touched her private parts, and threatened her to stay silent

Parents saw the signs—pain while urinating, blood, the girl’s fear—so they took action.

---

2. Legal Proceedings & Charges

• Section 6 of POCSO Act (aggravated penetrative sexual assault) was invoked
• Trial took place at Fast Track Special Court No. 2, Imphal—judges fast‑track child sexual assault cases for swift justice.
• After examining 12 prosecution witnesses, 16 documents, and six material objects, the court found Amusana guilty

---

3. Verdict & Sentencing

• Sentence: 20 years’ rigorous imprisonment
• Fine: ₹5,000
• Pre‑trial detention (Mar 9–Oct 1, 2018)—6 months and 22 days—was credited to the sentence e-

---

4. Compensation & Victim Support

A vital element: the court ordered the Manipur state government to compensate the victim:

• ₹4 lakh from the Victim Compensation Fund
• Payable within 30 days post formal verification

This financial support recognizes the emotional and psychological damage—especially critical for recovery.

---

---

Final Takeaway

This case is more than a conviction; it’s a declaration. By sentencing the accused to 20 years, deducting pre‑trial custody, and awarding victim compensation, Manipur’s judiciary sent a clear message: No tolerance for crimes against children.

But no single conviction is enough. It takes collective vigilance—from families, educators, law enforcement, the legal system, and media—to maintain safe spaces for India’s children.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What’s the difference between penetrative and aggravated assault under POCSO?
Penetrative assault involves insertion or touching private areas. Aggravated includes additional factors: use of violence, threats, multiple offenders—leading to stricter punishments.

2. Why use Fast‑Track Courts for POCSO cases?
These courts expedite proceedings while ensuring the child’s comfort—protecting them from prolonged trauma and delays.

3. What is “rigorous imprisonment”?
It means the convict undertakes hard labor during jail time—more severe than standard imprisonment.

4. How is the Victim Compensation Fund different from the accused’s fine?
The fine punishes the offender. The compensation supports the victim’s rehabilitation—mental health, education, well-being.

5. Is reporting child sexual abuse mandatory?
Yes. Under POCSO, failure to report such crimes—even by bystanders—can lead to legal consequences.

---