PM Modi’s Message to the People of Nepal from Manipur “A Sign of Resurgence”
While speaking in Imphal, Manipur on September 13, 2025, Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the people of Nepal, congratulating Sushila Karki on being named interim prime minister and praising Nepal’s youth for civic action — notably images of young people cleaning streets after recent protests — calling that behaviour “a sign of resurgence.” The remarks came amid intense political turbulence in Kathmandu, where mass Gen-Z protests toppled the previous government and an interim administration was installed with elections scheduled for March 5, 2026.
- Where: Imphal, Manipur (Kangla Fort speech).
- Who was mentioned: Sushila Karki — a former chief justice now named interim prime minister of Nepal.
- What PM Modi said: He congratulated Karki, praised Nepalese youth (noting images of them cleaning streets), called this “a sign of resurgence,” and wished for peace and stability in Nepal.
- Why it mattered: Because Nepal had just seen mass protests that toppled the government and led to negotiations to appoint an interim leader and set new elections.
What exactly did Modi say about Nepal — and why the “sign of resurgence” line mattered
- Congratulated the new interim PM — a clear verbal recognition of the leadership change.
- Praised the youth — mentioning, almost offhand, that he had seen young Nepalis cleaning the streets after protests and holding themselves to account. He called that behaviour a sign of a nation’s resurgence
- Offered best wishes — for peace, stability and prosperity, echoing official Indian policy statements that India stands by Nepal’s democratic processes.
FAQs
Q1: Did PM Modi officially endorse Sushila Karki as Nepal’s prime minister?
A1: PM Modi publicly congratulated Sushila Karki on her appointment and expressed best wishes for peace and stability. That is a diplomatic congratulations and recognition of the interim leadership; it does not equate to endorsing specific policy choices.
Q2: Why were Nepal’s protests described as “Gen-Z”?
A2: Media used “Gen-Z” because the protests were heavily organised by young people using social media platforms (including novel tools and chat apps) and because many leaders and participants were in their teens and twenties, giving the movement a distinct youth character. The protests built quickly via online mobilisation and street action.
Q3: How serious was the unrest in Nepal? Were there casualties?
A3: Reports indicate significant violence during the protests, with multiple casualties and many injured. Different outlets reported figures (dozens killed and over a thousand injured in some tallies). The unrest prompted a rapid political transition and the dissolution of parliament. Independent verification and official tallies will continue to be important
Q4: Will India be involved in Nepal’s election process?
A4: India typically supports stability and works with caretaker administrations to ensure safe conditions for elections, but it does not run elections in Nepal. India’s role is diplomatic and supportive — focusing on humanitarian assistance, maintaining open channels with Nepali leaders, and encouraging credible, peaceful electoral processes.
Q5: What can international observers do to help Nepal now?
A5: International actors can push for transparent investigations into the violence, provide humanitarian aid to affected families, support electoral integrity measures, and encourage inclusive political dialogue. Co-ordinated international engagement helps maintain pressure for accountability while supporting peaceful recovery.
